Ediot praising Dr Katharine Morrison on the bile blog, she's the one who had her boy injecting insulin every two hours and following a strict low carb diet, worthy of praise?
The comments after this : Anonymous24 November 2012 08:51 Truth here, not the made up opinions of the Ediot and Co. Will not load. Would it be possible to add them to part two please? on Has Pneu a twin? at 16:16 Exactly!! Then they worry about not getting enough vitamins/minerals and end up with half of Holland & Barrett in their cupboards. Eat a healthy sensible diet and you won't need to supplement, and no need for guilt ridden confessions after you have fallen off your wagons for the umpteenth time. A funny lot those low carbers! on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 24/11/12
The vocal low carbers that frequent DCUK can cure anything, all you have to do is follow a very low carb diet and take as many supplements as is humanly possible, There you are, diabetes plus all other ills cured. Side effects? What about side effects as they are inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. You can be on your knees, feeling very ill but as long as you follow their direction you will be alright. If you are not feeling well then all they can say is that you are not doing it properly. One size seems to fit all if you low carb and yet they lambast the NHS because they think that is what their message is. on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 24/11/12
Because some of our members feel bad about leaving the "noobs" at "the other place" without a sensible source of advice. Stop trying to cultivate a "them" and "us" attitude. We are only interested in spreading the ETYM message, and helping fellow diabetics. The only success that any of us are interested in, will be measured in saved fingers and toes. Stephen on Has Pneu a twin? in response to Truth here, not the made up opinions of the Ediot and Co. If ETYM is such a great forum then why are it's non banned members still posting on DCUK? Are they still trying to recruit or are they feeling so important in the D world that they feel their views need to be heard by a wider audience? They would have nothing to say without being able to reference their gurus. What a sad bunch of misfits who clutch at straws and the views of a few very dodgy gurus. They feel they are indispensable but in reality they are stirrers. Their advice is anecdotal and cannot be taken seriously by anyone with a brain. We are now being told that we need copious amounts of VitaminD and the warnings about overdosing on this are just scaremongering. I value my kidneys and bones too much to take this advice. Where do they think the excess calcium goes? They are persuasive to people who do not know them but they are also dangerous and should carry a health warning. , by Anonymous. Stephen Ferguson
I really don't think Ediot had a choice about closing his blog. He took it too far. The sooner that ETYM wise up about him then the better it will be for them. Some posts describing him need a sick bucket handy and goes to prove that they have no idea about how to recognise a dodgy character. There is only one post that questions his blog activities. Is he Pneu's twin or his evil Uncle? on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 25/11/12
really don't think Ediot had a choice about closing his blog. He took it too far. The sooner that ETYM wise up about him then the better it will be for them. Some posts describing him need a sick bucket handy and goes to prove that they have no idea about how to recognise a dodgy character. There is only one post that questions his blog activities. Is he Pneu's twin or his evil Uncle? on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 25/11/12
You say that their advice "cannot be taken seriously by anyone with a brain" well be safe, you are not in any danger. on Has Pneu a twin? A soon to be Ex-DUKer on 26/11/12
No I meant "Looks like here has taken over being the Bile Blog now. Well done you won!" on Has Pneu a twin? in response to Looks like here has taken over being the Bile Blog now. Well done you won! , by Anonymous. Anonymous on 27/11/12
Errrrm, wonder what you mean by that? The inference being that there was another bile blog before this one. Wonder which one that was. on Has Pneu a twin? in response to Looks like here has taken over being the Bile Blog now. Well done you won! , by Anonymous. Carb O'Phile on 27/11/12
Hi guys - he is back on his blog!!! on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 28/11/12
Seems to me that diabetes blogs and forums attract more than the usual amount of nutters regardless of which 'side' you are on. Had to laugh at the comment on Eddie's blog thanking him for allowing an uncensored place to air your points. Eddie used to bang on about freedom of speech all the time, but as soon as he could control the content he censored away like mad.I've tried to add very reasoned comments on Eddies blogg on six occasions. Not one of them have made it to publication. He is a sad embittered hypocrit. And I'm a low carber! on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 28/11/12
Ah well he lasted 7 days! The blog is back looking for new targets!Let's hope the new targets can afford to sue him! on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 28/11/12
Fear not, he is being closely watched :-) And things are about to happen to give him a Christmas to remember, law suits come in pretty wrapping..........watch this space foreetrather info on Has Pneu a twin? Janet on 29/11/12
I see Ediot is pushing his luck on the new forum. Very apt title too. http://www.eattoyourmeter.com/index.php/forum/blogs/419-the-ramblings-of-an-old-fool I expect he already has a couple of sock puppets lined up for when the proverbial hits the fan. on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous on 29/11/12
The comments after this : Anonymous24 November 2012 08:51 Truth here, not the made up opinions of the Ediot and Co. Will not load. Would it be possible to add them to part two please? on Has Pneu a twin? Anonymous at 16:16
Ediot won't hack ETYM for long. He will either be banned or move on. He cannot cope with not being the Head Honcho or that people have differing opinions to his. His little Ducky friend is trying hard to support him but they are both outclassed and outnumbered. People don't want to listen to his rambling anywhere, he is past his sell by date.
"Exactly!! Then they worry about not getting enough vitamins/minerals and end up with half of Holland & Barrett in their cupboards. Eat a healthy sensible diet and you won't need to supplement, and no need for guilt ridden confessions after you have fallen off your wagons for the umpteenth time."
I don't take any supplements, apart from VitD when I remember to take it. I've dabbled with MCT and BCAA for running, but that has nothing to do with diabetes.
Ediot's blog & ETYM should take a leaf out of Jimmy M's book and allow advertising for all the vitamins they throw down their necks, after all xyzzy & Defren are the King & Queen of supplements with the young prince Dilly not far behind.
From Twinkle, Where have I said that I cannot control my diabetes? I can control my diabetes but for you to control mine or anyone else's you would have to be with me 24/7 smarty pants. You obviously have trouble with comprehension.
That would be medical advice then, wouldn't it? You obviously have a good understanding of Twinkle's diabetes. All we need to know now, is who is your insurer? I'm sure they'd be more than happy to see you handing out medical advice of the Internet.
Here's what one diabetes related forum has to say about dietary advice.
So, you're not a doctor then? What qualifications do you hold? Are you a registered dietitian? If so, I can hardly restrain the excitement I feel in anticipation of reading your next pearls of wisdom.
Perhaps you're a nutritionist? I believe my opinions of that deservedly unsung profession are well documented in other articles on this blog.
Or perhaps, as I suspect is the case, you are just another diabetic. In which case, your opinion about how I should manage my diabetes just doesn't interest me - sorry...NOT!
To Anonymous, Are you also related to Eddie? You know nothing about me so how could you possible give me dietary advice? I am always wary of so called experts as they usually have preconceived ideas that they cannot budge from. NHS is accused of one size fits all, (not true) and yet we are being told that there is only one suitable diet for diabetics by some people on diabetic forums. Sigh.............. Twinkle.
How sad it is to deal with the uneducated, who put so much faith in other people's qualifications. You dismiss "experts" but you rely religeously on the expertise on people that went to medical school in the 1970s and haven't updated their training since.
Dear Anonymous, You obviously have issues with professionals and seem to have been brainwashed by gurus. It is impossible to debate with your closed mind.
If by "brainwashing" you mean "doing my own research" then I'm very brainwashed.
There are two types of diabetics, those who are prepared to educate themselves and learn from a wide range of experience, and those that blindly follow the advice of their Doctor.
I wonder which of those two groups is the most successful?
I'm advising people to draw from the widest range of experiences, and not to trust any one person (or institution's) advice.
The idea that you cannot learn from other people's experiences "because they cannot control your diabetes" is frankly idiotic. You deserve whatever you get.
Are you? From what I've seen you're telling people how to manage their diabetes based on your experience:
"I could give you a set of simple instructions to follow..."
Not from the widest range of experiences, and not based on a proper review of the evidence available - which makes you a nutritionist. Not a diabetes specialist, nor a dietitian.
I could give you the benefit of my (and several other diabetics) experience. I'm pretty sure that my approach works for most, if not all, diabetics, but you should rightly regard it as one evidence source among many.
I am neither a nutritionaist or a dietician. I'm just an experienced and successful diabetic. That alone should give my evidence more weight than that from people that are neither diabetics nor experienced.
The advice that I prescribe is neither high-carb, nor low-carb, it is simply the common sense advice to "EAT TO YOUR METER". I would have thought that it was difficult for any diabetic to disagree with that.
I am not sure why anyone uses people they do not know for advice - they may be telling lies!! I have been looking at the new forum section on what I ate today - their diets are shocking. I think missing meals and eating such a limited intake of food is very unhealthy.
The new forum is not interested in nutrition, it is all about lowering your blood sugars. Some of them eat a diet suitable for a small bird, seeds, seeds an more seeds. I dread to think the health problems they will face later.
The trouble with diaries is whether the truth is recorded or not. I doubt anyone records everything. Here's the difference between what one lady recorded what she ate and what doubly labelled water revealed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KA9AdlhB18o
"Are you? From what I've seen you're telling people how to manage their diabetes based on your experience:
"I could give you a set of simple instructions to follow...
Not from the widest range of experiences, and not based on a proper review of the evidence available - which makes you a nutritionist. Not a diabetes specialist, nor a dietitian."
Are we to follow you Carbo and consume a diet based on toast and junk. Corrected by a copious amount of Orlistat.
This blog does not give dietary advice, never has. There is nobody who posts here who is qualified to give it. A true professional would not give advice on the internet for a specific poster.
Ediot and a few more loudmouths who frequent blogs and forums seem to have all the answers but they only think they have.
As for Carbo's diet, we only have Ediot's take on it and as he does not agree with anyone who dares to eat carbs, he is hardly going to admit that he he does no know enough about Carbo's lifestyle, genetics and all the other factors that have to be taken into consideration by professionals offering advice.
Ediot will never budge from his ideology that extreme low carbing is the only way to manage diabetes.
Ediot has proved time and time again that he is a simple man with a simple brain. People like Ediot tend to discount anything that they consider undesired information. If he thought that grass was purple you would have an unenviable task trying to convince him that it was not true.
And all those fanatical low carbers have gained their 'knowledge' from books that were written by journalists......pretty limited in their knowledge then. Which proves my point when I always say those with the least knowledge are the loudest, the less they know the more fanatical and loud they become. Reading through this blog I have found some good recipes, also a post from Carbo saying he has managed to lose surplus weight albeit with a little assistance in the form of Orlistat under medical guidance which sounds an awful lot better to me than supergob Defren who lost weight on minimum carbs and ended up fainting all over the place. And before I finish, I would like a quid for every low carber whingeing on about their lack of weight loss......poor tortured souls and a boring lot to boot, imagine sharing your life with a low carb fanatic LOL
Yes, the Ediot has certainly put his toe in the water and tried to disrupt the new forum with his "Dropping the Big 5". When will he wake up to the fact that low carb is not the only way to manage diabetes? It has been suggested there that everyone read the forum rules. Ediot does not believe in rules, he likes to be the mouthpiece on every forum he disrupts. Sad, sad Ediot.
Let's hope that ETYM members will stop championing him on his blog now. They had a lot to say there about other diabetics that Eddie did not like.
DCUK is still flourishing and ETYM have learned a lesson, Ediot is a bad influence and a social outcast and is far from popular with people who understand that diabetes management is a personal thing.
I am surprised that he hasn't tried the sympathy vote. He hasn't actually been banned from ETYM so he will try to gain support for his rigid management. I wouldn't be surprised if he will be pulling at heart strings in the near future. So misunderstood......NOT.
Would be nice for someone from ETYM to comment on here and admit they were wrong in accepting the Ediot as part of the new forum, despite repeated warnings they went ahead and welcomed him with open arms.
Next step for them is to spot the sock-puppet accounts he and the duck have set up since joining, he'll use these to cause more trouble and seek revenge on those who stood against him.
Everyone is welcome to contribute to the ETYM forum, including Eddie. I've enjoyed the contributions that he's made, and I hope he continues to make them in the future.
Edie might be sulking but IMHO, ETYM has got egg on it's face. They thought he was a much maligned individual. I think they thought Ediot was with them and their mission statement but he has proved that he only thinks of what he considers is the way forward. He will try again to disrupt them as he now sees this as a war. Plenty of members there have never posted so some might be sock puppets to be used to further his battle. Usually he comes back with his tail between his legs and when the coast is clear he starts his nonsense again.
ETYM has started a topic, " We are an inclusive forum". Must be heralded as laugh of the week. If they had been inclusive on DCUK there would have been no need to leave there or have they discovered the error of their ways thanks to the Ediot?
They were dishing out advice on DCUK and telling people what they could and could not eat.
Having read Stephens statement, I have to ask if he is related to the Ediot? Maybe it was triplets, Ediot, Pneu and Borofergie? I felt sorry for Lucylocket not Ediot.
Based on a single meal (ie the subjects weren't adapted to their diet), they compared a high-carb low-fat meal, with a high-carb high-fat meal.
What does that have to do with low-carbing? I think that we can all agree that if you're going to eat a high-carb diet, you're probably best not making it a high-fat diet too.
Do you even read this stuff before you post it? Sheesh...
You couldn't make it up could you. Ediot gets a negative response to a post he makes and he acts like a wounded animal and decides he is not needed on ETYM. "I am not going to play anymore as I want to be in charge and you won't let me", sob sob.
"Each dinner had identical carbohydrate and protein content, but different fat content (60 vs. 10 g)."
You can work out the carbohydrate content of the meal from the insulin units and the carb to insulin ratios: the meal contained 115g of carbohydrate. That's a lot of carbohydrate.
Also worth noting that the high-fat dinner contained 450kcal more than the low fat dinner, making it a bizarre comparison.
No I do not stand or even sit corrected. If you were an experienced type 1 then you would know that most type 1's need one heck of a lot more insulin for a fatty meal then a none fat meal. I'm a low carber, using minimum fat due to finding many years ago that high fat diets increase the need for more insulin compared to a lower fat meal.
You seem to forget that with the added knowledge of Jimmy Moore and Gary Taubes, Borofergie knows more about your diabetes than you ever will. You only live it whereas he reads about it......Sarcastic sigh. Ludicrous I know but there are a lot of people who think they know more than anyone else about everything and they have publicly stated that they hate being wrong so he will keep arguing and hope you will back down.
"No I do not stand or even sit corrected. If you were an experienced type 1 then you would know that most type 1's need one heck of a lot more insulin for a fatty meal then a none fat meal."
I'm sure that's true. I'm sure that it's also true that you need one heck of a lote more insulin for a high-fat high-carb meal than you do for a low-carb high-fat meal.
Eddie and I both promote a low-carb lifestyle. This study has nothing to do with low-carb, so your original statement was completely wrong.
As for "hating being wrong", I don't have enough experience of that to tell you whether I hate it or not.
Definitely related to Ediot. You have all the characteristics. Smug and conceited, an offensive satisfaction with yourself and an inflated self image and perception of yourself.
I'm sure that's true. I'm sure that it's also true that you need one heck of a lote more insulin for a high-fat high-carb meal than you do for a low-carb high-fat meal.
Now you are just being anal. My point was that many type 1's need as much if not more insulin for a non carb meal (fat and protien) as they do for a meal containing carbs. Your preaching and screachings are misplaced and damned right dangerous for many diabetics. Perhaps if you disagree with my findings you could provide your medical credentials? As a type 2 I'm sure you must have qualifications to substanciate your comments regarding type 1's.
Both Eddie and I are proponents of a low-carb diet, the paper you quoted had nothing to do with low-carb.
Dear Stevie Wonder, the article was discussing FAT and FAT is what you, the ediot and every other lcarber HF promote until it comes out of your ears. It does not suit type 1's. Perhaps someone should tell dickhead dilly this? He sure didn't listen to the members on dcuk who told him his problem and how to fix it.
If we didn't know Ediot we would say it was an injustice. Have you noticed he already is naming names. Defren looks as though she will be in for a hard time on his blog.
All I can say is that they were warned but decided that they knew best, after all he was an avid low carber and they are all good guys.
Wait until later when the Ediot is pissed up, no one will be spared in his pursuit to destroy those who stand against him.
No sympathy whatsoever for the gang, they were warned in advance but thought they knew best in allowing him to join the forum, history repeats itself time and time again where the Ediot is concerned.
What a strange post. Why do you pour scorn on a group of people taking someone at face value? I applaud ETYM for giving Eddie another go, I also applaud it's members for standing up to him too!
Eddie is, in my opinion, a vile man. I wouldn't criticise others for holding out the hand of friendship to him though. Eddie is the one at fault here not ETYM.
By the way I am not a member of ETYM or any other diabetes forum, they seem to attract more nutters than most forums. I gave up on them years ago.
It might not have occurred to you Edie, but anonymity isn't the crime of the century you know - and as many will bear witness to (on this blog anyway), knowing someone's name doesn't mean they are a saint.
“It might not have occurred to you Edie, but anonymity isn't the crime of the century you know - and as many will bear witness to (on this blog anyway), knowing someone's name doesn't mean they are a saint.”
It occurred to me a long time ago Carbo, and it seemed reasonable to me, a man who hid in the shadows as an anonymous, was a cowardly and gutless man, a man without the courage of his convictions. Saint, I’m about a million miles from becoming a Saint.
And did it occur to you that the Pope's reluctance to beatify you might also be a reason why so many commenters on here choose to remain anonymous. Not because they are are gutless cowards, but because they don't want their families to experience cold calling bullies like you?
Carbo you twice signposted my private address on your blog. Because of threats and junk turning up at my house, and the fear caused to my wife, we dumped the place. And you have the neck to comment on one phone call I made to a dietition to confirm her identity, which I reported myself.
Ediot, you poor old sod, you had to dump your home because of threats and junk, did you? We all know that this is an out and out lie, you were forced to shift because you ran into financial difficulty.
If you received threats and junk you can only blame yourself for it, authors of vile blogs will inevitably create enemies. Face up to it, you are about as popular as a fart in a lift, nobody likes you.
Some of us know more than Ediot thinks. Just the dietitian that you gave a hard time was it? You know that is not true too You may get more surprises Ediot. You can run but you cannot hide.
As we are not pulling the punches, according to another one of your blogs, you suffered severe child abuse when young. Do you think this may have a bearing on your attitude on this blog ?
And this post confirms what a complete and utter b'stard you are, not that this has come as a surprise. I am beginning to wonder if they dropped you on your head a few times after birth. Karma will catch up with you eventually, you will get what you deserve fair and square.
I am absolutely appalled at the last comment by Eddie - no wonder the ETYM forum has dumped him and all of his so called friends have stayed away from the blog.
You really have surpassed yourself Ediot. You are lower than a snake's belly and it begs the question why anyone would want to associate with you unless they hold the same immoral values as you do.
ETYM didn't dump him, he left of his own volition. He would still be posting there if the members were in agreement with him. He is unable to debate but takes everything personally. Those who know him are aware that he cannot accept criticism.
If ETYM had really known him then he wouldn't have even been able to join. The very fact that he was allowed membership there put a lot of people off joining and there doesn't seem to be a lot of movement there anyway. The same old people all agreeing with each other. In order for a forum to survive you need some debating but with the exception of Ediot's controversial contributions, there is nothing going on.
All there seems to be is an unhealthy "How many Karma's can I get competition" and some re-runs of the recipes on DCUK.
Ediot, I have news for you, I am the one who called you an utter and complete b*stard, I believe in speaking the truth :-) I am also neither a dullard, nor a drug addict or carb infested, in actual fact I probably eat less carbs than you do. My personal choice, I dont go bragging on about it because I do believe in freedom of choice and know that despite what you seem to think, low carb is not the only way to control diabetes. Look forward to karma hitting you, that time will surely come, when it does, go, look over your shoulder, you will see us standing there laughing with all our might. You are an evil, rotten character through and through, its quite an achievement actually.........
You can see the tumbleweed rolling by in Eddies blog. He is trying more and more extreme posts to get posters and attention. After his last comment here, he should be quiet and ashamed of himself.
“Ediot, I have news for you, I am the one who called you an utter and complete b*stard, I believe in speaking the truth :-) I am also neither a dullard, nor a drug addict or carb infested, in actual fact I probably eat less carbs than you do. My personal choice, I dont go bragging on about it because I do believe in freedom of choice and know that despite what you seem to think, low carb is not the only way to control diabetes. Look forward to karma hitting you, that time will surely come, when it does, go, look over your shoulder, you will see us standing there laughing with all our might. You are an evil, rotten character through and through, its quite an achievement actually......…”
So bravely spoken, I am in awe of your courage. We need more people like you. Honest, brave, and people who have the courage of their convictions. Carbo sets the example, gutless, cowardly and damaged, but heh that’s what this blog is all about. A home for the weak and the damaged.
Your growing on me Carbo. Like some cancerous wart. How you would like to come out of the shadows of the gutless and anonymous. One day eh mate, true freedom and salvation. A life without fear, and breathing fresh air. Try it, it’s wonderful. To live a life without fear of outcome.
So speaketh the man who hides behind anonymous blogs and sock puppets. The only reason why you are so 'open' is because you stupidly allowed your details to be freely accessed on the net.
If you are so open why do you censor so many posts on your blog? I've made many an attempt to post a reasoned comment on there but not one has been published.
There's only one thing that's worse that a coward Eddie, and that's a hypocritical coward. Eddie, you are weak and a coward to boot we all know you wouldn't meet anyone face to face, you can't even hack being disagreed with on ETYM without having a flounce. You're the archetypal coward Eddie, admit it, know it makes sense.
Heaven forbid anyone takes on Ediot's traits, who would want to live his kind of lifestyle sitting in front of their PC non-stop spewing rubbish and bile? Incidnetally, Ediot has his uses, quirky friend of mine, a printer presented me with an early Christmas present, a bogroll with Ediots pic printed on every sheet ROTFL 1001 uses of Ediot- already knew his mugshot makes the perfect dartboard cover, Ediot, feel the vibes LOL
It took longer than I thought but Eddie is finally getting the kicking he deserves. To think he even tried to befriend me on facebook. What a loser LOL
Loading does not work. How about starting part two?
ReplyDeleteGlad to be of service.
ReplyDeleteEdiot praising Dr Katharine Morrison on the bile blog, she's the one who had her boy injecting insulin every two hours and following a strict low carb diet, worthy of praise?
ReplyDeleteThe comments after this : Anonymous24 November 2012 08:51 Truth here, not the made up opinions of the Ediot and Co. Will not load. Would it be possible to add them to part two please? on Has Pneu a twin?
ReplyDeleteat 16:16
Exactly!! Then they worry about not getting enough vitamins/minerals and end up with half of Holland & Barrett in their cupboards. Eat a healthy sensible diet and you won't need to supplement, and no need for guilt ridden confessions after you have fallen off your wagons for the umpteenth time. A funny lot those low carbers! on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous on 24/11/12
The vocal low carbers that frequent DCUK can cure anything, all you have to do is follow a very low carb diet and take as many supplements as is humanly possible, There you are, diabetes plus all other ills cured. Side effects? What about side effects as they are inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. You can be on your knees, feeling very ill but as long as you follow their direction you will be alright. If you are not feeling well then all they can say is that you are not doing it properly. One size seems to fit all if you low carb and yet they lambast the NHS because they think that is what their message is. on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous on 24/11/12
Because some of our members feel bad about leaving the "noobs" at "the other place" without a sensible source of advice. Stop trying to cultivate a "them" and "us" attitude. We are only interested in spreading the ETYM message, and helping fellow diabetics. The only success that any of us are interested in, will be measured in saved fingers and toes. Stephen on Has Pneu a twin?
in response to Truth here, not the made up opinions of the Ediot and Co. If ETYM is such a great forum then why are it's non banned members still posting on DCUK? Are they still trying to recruit or are they feeling so important in the D world that they feel their views need to be heard by a wider audience? They would have nothing to say without being able to reference their gurus. What a sad bunch of misfits who clutch at straws and the views of a few very dodgy gurus. They feel they are indispensable but in reality they are stirrers. Their advice is anecdotal and cannot be taken seriously by anyone with a brain. We are now being told that we need copious amounts of VitaminD and the warnings about overdosing on this are just scaremongering. I value my kidneys and bones too much to take this advice. Where do they think the excess calcium goes? They are persuasive to people who do not know them but they are also dangerous and should carry a health warning. , by Anonymous.
Stephen Ferguson
I really don't think Ediot had a choice about closing his blog. He took it too far. The sooner that ETYM wise up about him then the better it will be for them. Some posts describing him need a sick bucket handy and goes to prove that they have no idea about how to recognise a dodgy character. There is only one post that questions his blog activities. Is he Pneu's twin or his evil Uncle? on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous on 25/11/12
really don't think Ediot had a choice about closing his blog. He took it too far. The sooner that ETYM wise up about him then the better it will be for them. Some posts describing him need a sick bucket handy and goes to prove that they have no idea about how to recognise a dodgy character. There is only one post that questions his blog activities. Is he Pneu's twin or his evil Uncle? on Has Pneu a twin?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous on 25/11/12
You say that their advice "cannot be taken seriously by anyone with a brain" well be safe, you are not in any danger. on Has Pneu a twin?
A soon to be Ex-DUKer on 26/11/12
No I meant "Looks like here has taken over being the Bile Blog now. Well done you won!" on Has Pneu a twin?
in response to Looks like here has taken over being the Bile Blog now. Well done you won! , by Anonymous.
Anonymous on 27/11/12
Errrrm, wonder what you mean by that? The inference being that there was another bile blog before this one. Wonder which one that was. on Has Pneu a twin?
in response to Looks like here has taken over being the Bile Blog now. Well done you won! , by Anonymous.
Carb O'Phile on 27/11/12
Hi guys - he is back on his blog!!! on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous on 28/11/12
Seems to me that diabetes blogs and forums attract more than the usual amount of nutters regardless of which 'side' you are on. Had to laugh at the comment on Eddie's blog thanking him for allowing an uncensored place to air your points. Eddie used to bang on about freedom of speech all the time, but as soon as he could control the content he censored away like mad.I've tried to add very reasoned comments on Eddies blogg on six occasions. Not one of them have made it to publication. He is a sad embittered hypocrit. And I'm a low carber! on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous on 28/11/12
Ah well he lasted 7 days! The blog is back looking for new targets!Let's hope the new targets can afford to sue him! on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous on 28/11/12
Fear not, he is being closely watched :-) And things are about to happen to give him a Christmas to remember, law suits come in pretty wrapping..........watch this space foreetrather info on Has Pneu a twin?
Janet on 29/11/12
I see Ediot is pushing his luck on the new forum. Very apt title too. http://www.eattoyourmeter.com/index.php/forum/blogs/419-the-ramblings-of-an-old-fool I expect he already has a couple of sock puppets lined up for when the proverbial hits the fan. on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous on 29/11/12
All in response to this request..
ReplyDeleteThe comments after this : Anonymous24 November 2012 08:51 Truth here, not the made up opinions of the Ediot and Co. Will not load. Would it be possible to add them to part two please? on Has Pneu a twin?
Anonymous at 16:16
Ediot won't hack ETYM for long. He will either be banned or move on. He cannot cope with not being the Head Honcho or that people have differing opinions to his. His little Ducky friend is trying hard to support him but they are both outclassed and outnumbered.
ReplyDeletePeople don't want to listen to his rambling anywhere, he is past his sell by date.
"Exactly!! Then they worry about not getting enough vitamins/minerals and end up with half of Holland & Barrett in their cupboards. Eat a healthy sensible diet and you won't need to supplement, and no need for guilt ridden confessions after you have fallen off your wagons for the umpteenth time."
ReplyDeleteI don't take any supplements, apart from VitD when I remember to take it. I've dabbled with MCT and BCAA for running, but that has nothing to do with diabetes.
Thank you for your kind concern.
Stephen
What a high quality blog this is. It must have helped thousands of people to control their diabetes.
ReplyDeleteI have never known this blog to give advice for diabetics. I doubt that is what it is here for as we are not qualified.
ReplyDeleteI am sure we are more interested in the misinformation that people who think they are experts seem to dish out on a daily basis.
You cannot control my diabetes and I cannot control yours so what is the point in telling other people what to do?
Twinkle.
Ediot's blog & ETYM should take a leaf out of Jimmy M's book and allow advertising for all the vitamins they throw down their necks, after all xyzzy & Defren are the King & Queen of supplements with the young prince Dilly not far behind.
ReplyDeleteSo Eddie has resigned ( ????) from the ETYM board - wonder if it is true?
ReplyDelete"You cannot control my diabetes and I cannot control yours"
ReplyDeleteYou cannot control yours, so what hope does anyone else have?
From Twinkle,
ReplyDeleteWhere have I said that I cannot control my diabetes?
I can control my diabetes but for you to control mine or anyone else's you would have to be with me 24/7 smarty pants. You obviously have trouble with comprehension.
Logic obviously isn't yours. Why would I have to be with you 24 hours a day? I could give you a set of simple instructions to follow...
DeleteIf you don't have the willpower to follow them, that's your problem.
That would be medical advice then, wouldn't it? You obviously have a good understanding of Twinkle's diabetes. All we need to know now, is who is your insurer? I'm sure they'd be more than happy to see you handing out medical advice of the Internet.
ReplyDeleteNo. It would be common sense dietary advice. You can ask a Doctor to help you with your medication.
ReplyDeleteHere's what one diabetes related forum has to say about dietary advice.
DeleteSo, you're not a doctor then? What qualifications do you hold? Are you a registered dietitian? If so, I can hardly restrain the excitement I feel in anticipation of reading your next pearls of wisdom.
Perhaps you're a nutritionist? I believe my opinions of that deservedly unsung profession are well documented in other articles on this blog.
Or perhaps, as I suspect is the case, you are just another diabetic. In which case, your opinion about how I should manage my diabetes just doesn't interest me - sorry...NOT!
To Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteAre you also related to Eddie?
You know nothing about me so how could you possible give me dietary advice?
I am always wary of so called experts as they usually have preconceived ideas that they cannot budge from. NHS is accused of one size fits all, (not true) and yet we are being told that there is only one suitable diet for diabetics by some people on diabetic forums. Sigh..............
Twinkle.
How sad it is to deal with the uneducated, who put so much faith in other people's qualifications. You dismiss "experts" but you rely religeously on the expertise on people that went to medical school in the 1970s and haven't updated their training since.
ReplyDeleteGood luck with that.
Uneducated? How dare you? I'm offended! I distinctly remember spending at least one day in an institution which had the word school in the name.
DeleteBy "experts", do you mean drips under pressure?
Dear Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteYou obviously have issues with professionals and seem to have been brainwashed by gurus. It is impossible to debate with your closed mind.
Twinkle.
If by "brainwashing" you mean "doing my own research" then I'm very brainwashed.
DeleteThere are two types of diabetics, those who are prepared to educate themselves and learn from a wide range of experience, and those that blindly follow the advice of their Doctor.
I wonder which of those two groups is the most successful?
So, when asking us to rely on your expertise brought about because of you doing your own research, you're asking us to blindly follow your advice?
DeleteYou are a nutritionist aren't you?
I'm advising people to draw from the widest range of experiences, and not to trust any one person (or institution's) advice.
DeleteThe idea that you cannot learn from other people's experiences "because they cannot control your diabetes" is frankly idiotic. You deserve whatever you get.
Are you? From what I've seen you're telling people how to manage their diabetes based on your experience:
Delete"I could give you a set of simple instructions to follow..."
Not from the widest range of experiences, and not based on a proper review of the evidence available - which makes you a nutritionist. Not a diabetes specialist, nor a dietitian.
I could give you the benefit of my (and several other diabetics) experience. I'm pretty sure that my approach works for most, if not all, diabetics, but you should rightly regard it as one evidence source among many.
DeleteI am neither a nutritionaist or a dietician. I'm just an experienced and successful diabetic. That alone should give my evidence more weight than that from people that are neither diabetics nor experienced.
The advice that I prescribe is neither high-carb, nor low-carb, it is simply the common sense advice to "EAT TO YOUR METER". I would have thought that it was difficult for any diabetic to disagree with that.
I am not sure why anyone uses people they do not know for advice - they may be telling lies!!
ReplyDeleteI have been looking at the new forum section on what I ate today - their diets are shocking. I think missing meals and eating such a limited intake of food is very unhealthy.
The new forum is not interested in nutrition, it is all about lowering your blood sugars. Some of them eat a diet suitable for a small bird, seeds, seeds an more seeds. I dread to think the health problems they will face later.
ReplyDeleteThe trouble with diaries is whether the truth is recorded or not. I doubt anyone records everything.
ReplyDeleteHere's the difference between what one lady recorded what she ate and what doubly labelled water revealed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KA9AdlhB18o
"Are you? From what I've seen you're telling people how to manage their diabetes based on your experience:
ReplyDelete"I could give you a set of simple instructions to follow...
Not from the widest range of experiences, and not based on a proper review of the evidence available - which makes you a nutritionist. Not a diabetes specialist, nor a dietitian."
Are we to follow you Carbo and consume a diet based on toast and junk. Corrected by a copious amount of Orlistat.
This blog does not give dietary advice, never has. There is nobody who posts here who is qualified to give it. A true professional would not give advice on the internet for a specific poster.
ReplyDeleteEdiot and a few more loudmouths who frequent blogs and forums seem to have all the answers but they only think they have.
As for Carbo's diet, we only have Ediot's take on it and as he does not agree with anyone who dares to eat carbs, he is hardly going to admit that he he does no know enough about Carbo's lifestyle, genetics and all the other factors that have to be taken into consideration by professionals offering advice.
Ediot will never budge from his ideology that extreme low carbing is the only way to manage diabetes.
Ediot has proved time and time again that he is a simple man with a simple brain. People like Ediot tend to discount anything that they consider undesired information. If he thought that grass was purple you would have an unenviable task trying to convince him that it was not true.
Amen to that!
DeleteAnd all those fanatical low carbers have gained their 'knowledge' from books that were written by journalists......pretty limited in their knowledge then.
Which proves my point when I always say those with the least knowledge are the loudest, the less they know the more fanatical and loud they become.
Reading through this blog I have found some good recipes, also a post from Carbo saying he has managed to lose surplus weight albeit with a little assistance in the form of Orlistat under medical guidance which sounds an awful lot better to me than supergob Defren who lost weight on minimum carbs and ended up fainting all over the place.
And before I finish, I would like a quid for every low carber whingeing on about their lack of weight loss......poor tortured souls and a boring lot to boot, imagine sharing your life with a low carb fanatic LOL
ZZzzzzzz. "Fanatics, feorists, and loonies" again.
DeleteI gained my initial knowledge of Low-Carbing from Bernstein, then from Phinney, Volek, Westman, Feinman, etc.
None of these people are journalists. Stop being a dick.
BF
We all knew Eddie would start at some point - look at the section on diabetes debate he is off !!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteYes, the Ediot has certainly put his toe in the water and tried to disrupt the new forum with his "Dropping the Big 5". When will he wake up to the fact that low carb is not the only way to manage diabetes?
ReplyDeleteIt has been suggested there that everyone read the forum rules. Ediot does not believe in rules, he likes to be the mouthpiece on every forum he disrupts. Sad, sad Ediot.
ha ha..the ediot getting the boot after 3 weeks of the forum starting up.
ReplyDeleteThey were warned about his history on diabetes forums and still they ignored it.
Well, a moderator's edit...hey ho, he can't have liked that
DeleteLet's hope that ETYM members will stop championing him on his blog now. They had a lot to say there about other diabetics that Eddie did not like.
ReplyDeleteDCUK is still flourishing and ETYM have learned a lesson, Ediot is a bad influence and a social outcast and is far from popular with people who understand that diabetes management is a personal thing.
I'll post anywhere I like.
DeleteThanks!
BF
The sock puppets will have to be used by Ediot now on ETYM. Wonder how many he has managed to put in place?
ReplyDeleteThe daft Duck will have to leave now as his master will demand it.
I am surprised that he hasn't tried the sympathy vote. He hasn't actually been banned from ETYM so he will try to gain support for his rigid management. I wouldn't be surprised if he will be pulling at heart strings in the near future. So misunderstood......NOT.
ReplyDeleteWould Edie be sulking by any chance?
ReplyDeletehttp://thelowcarbdiabetic.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/the-eat-to-your-meter-forum.html
Would be nice for someone from ETYM to comment on here and admit they were wrong in accepting the Ediot as part of the new forum, despite repeated warnings they went ahead and welcomed him with open arms.
ReplyDeleteNext step for them is to spot the sock-puppet accounts he and the duck have set up since joining, he'll use these to cause more trouble and seek revenge on those who stood against him.
Everyone is welcome to contribute to the ETYM forum, including Eddie. I've enjoyed the contributions that he's made, and I hope he continues to make them in the future.
DeleteBF
Edie might be sulking but IMHO, ETYM has got egg on it's face. They thought he was a much maligned individual.
ReplyDeleteI think they thought Ediot was with them and their mission statement but he has proved that he only thinks of what he considers is the way forward.
He will try again to disrupt them as he now sees this as a war. Plenty of members there have never posted so some might be sock puppets to be used to further his battle.
Usually he comes back with his tail between his legs and when the coast is clear he starts his nonsense again.
His blog will go back to ridiculing diabetics and some of the ETYM members will be in the firing line. He cannot help it, he is a lost cause.
ReplyDeleteHe will also highlight every post there that he considers is against his ideology. I bet he has spent a sleepless night plotting his revenge.
ETYM has started a topic, " We are an inclusive forum". Must be heralded as laugh of the week. If they had been inclusive on DCUK there would have been no need to leave there or have they discovered the error of their ways thanks to the Ediot?
ReplyDeleteThey were dishing out advice on DCUK and telling people what they could and could not eat.
When did anyone associated with ETYM ever tell anyone else what they could or could not eat?
DeleteI'll happily tell you what I do or do not eat, but I don't expect you to follow it (I doubt very strongly that most people could).
Having read Stephens statement, I have to ask if he is related to the Ediot? Maybe it was triplets, Ediot, Pneu and Borofergie?
ReplyDeleteI felt sorry for Lucylocket not Ediot.
Not to the best of my knowledge.
DeleteI think that LL is one of the shining lights of the ETYM community
Best regards.
Stephen
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/early/2012/11/19/dc12-0092.short
ReplyDeleteNow this is interesting. Perhaps Ediot needs to stop this one glove fits all and fat is harmless doctrine.
Based on a single meal (ie the subjects weren't adapted to their diet), they compared a high-carb low-fat meal, with a high-carb high-fat meal.
DeleteWhat does that have to do with low-carbing? I think that we can all agree that if you're going to eat a high-carb diet, you're probably best not making it a high-fat diet too.
Do you even read this stuff before you post it? Sheesh...
where does it say how many carbs were eaten?
DeleteYou couldn't make it up could you. Ediot gets a negative response to a post he makes and he acts like a wounded animal and decides he is not needed on ETYM.
ReplyDelete"I am not going to play anymore as I want to be in charge and you won't let me", sob sob.
"Each dinner had identical carbohydrate and protein content, but different fat content (60 vs. 10 g)."
ReplyDeleteYou can work out the carbohydrate content of the meal from the insulin units and the carb to insulin ratios: the meal contained 115g of carbohydrate. That's a lot of carbohydrate.
Also worth noting that the high-fat dinner contained 450kcal more than the low fat dinner, making it a bizarre comparison.
Do you stand corrected?
No I do not stand or even sit corrected.
DeleteIf you were an experienced type 1 then you would know that most type 1's need one heck of a lot more insulin for a fatty meal then a none fat meal.
I'm a low carber, using minimum fat due to finding many years ago that high fat diets increase the need for more insulin compared to a lower fat meal.
You seem to forget that with the added knowledge of Jimmy Moore and Gary Taubes, Borofergie knows more about your diabetes than you ever will. You only live it whereas he reads about it......Sarcastic sigh.
DeleteLudicrous I know but there are a lot of people who think they know more than anyone else about everything and they have publicly stated that they hate being wrong so he will keep arguing and hope you will back down.
"No I do not stand or even sit corrected.
DeleteIf you were an experienced type 1 then you would know that most type 1's need one heck of a lot more insulin for a fatty meal then a none fat meal."
I'm sure that's true. I'm sure that it's also true that you need one heck of a lote more insulin for a high-fat high-carb meal than you do for a low-carb high-fat meal.
Eddie and I both promote a low-carb lifestyle. This study has nothing to do with low-carb, so your original statement was completely wrong.
As for "hating being wrong", I don't have enough experience of that to tell you whether I hate it or not.
Definitely related to Ediot. You have all the characteristics. Smug and conceited, an offensive satisfaction with yourself and an inflated self image and perception of yourself.
DeleteSucks being me...
DeleteYes, I suspect it does :)
DeleteI'm sure that's true. I'm sure that it's also true that you need one heck of a lote more insulin for a high-fat high-carb meal than you do for a low-carb high-fat meal.
DeleteNow you are just being anal. My point was that many type 1's need as much if not more insulin for a non carb meal (fat and protien) as they do for a meal containing carbs.
Your preaching and screachings are misplaced and damned right dangerous for many diabetics. Perhaps if you disagree with my findings you could provide your medical credentials? As a type 2 I'm sure you must have qualifications to substanciate your comments regarding type 1's.
"ttp://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/early/2012/11/19/dc12-0092.short
DeleteNow this is interesting. Perhaps Ediot needs to stop this one glove fits all and fat is harmless doctrine."
Ummmm your point was a thinly based attack on "Ediot" and ETYM based on a paper that you didn't understand.
I know nothing about T1 diabetes, and I have never given advice to a T1 about anything.
Both Eddie and I are proponents of a low-carb diet, the paper you quoted had nothing to do with low-carb.
Both Eddie and I are proponents of a low-carb diet, the paper you quoted had nothing to do with low-carb.
DeleteDear Stevie Wonder, the article was discussing FAT and FAT is what you, the ediot and every other lcarber HF promote until it comes out of your ears. It does not suit type 1's. Perhaps someone should tell dickhead dilly this? He sure didn't listen to the members on dcuk who told him his problem and how to fix it.
I discuss FAT IN THE CONTEXT OF A LOW CARB DIET, which is completely different than IN THE CONTEXT OF A HIGH CARB DIET.
DeleteI have never advocated a high fat, high carb diet, neither has Eddie, why do you have trouble comprehending that?
Lol has anyone seen edies new sob story? Bet his version is ever so slightly different than the management of etym.
ReplyDeleteIf we didn't know Ediot we would say it was an injustice. Have you noticed he already is naming names. Defren looks as though she will be in for a hard time on his blog.
DeleteAll I can say is that they were warned but decided that they knew best, after all he was an avid low carber and they are all good guys.
Wait until later when the Ediot is pissed up, no one will be spared in his pursuit to destroy those who stand against him.
ReplyDeleteNo sympathy whatsoever for the gang, they were warned in advance but thought they knew best in allowing him to join the forum, history repeats itself time and time again where the Ediot is concerned.
If you listen very carefully you can hear the sound of me quaking in my boots.
DeleteWhat a strange post. Why do you pour scorn on a group of people taking someone at face value? I applaud ETYM for giving Eddie another go, I also applaud it's members for standing up to him too!
DeleteEddie is, in my opinion, a vile man. I wouldn't criticise others for holding out the hand of friendship to him though. Eddie is the one at fault here not ETYM.
By the way I am not a member of ETYM or any other diabetes forum, they seem to attract more nutters than most forums. I gave up on them years ago.
Could it be true ? Is Stephen Ferguson Monty Beantipper’s long lost love child ?
ReplyDeleteOne things for sure, he is a true lowcarb warrior in the finest tradition, and no skulking in the anonymous shadows for Fergie.
Eddie Mitchell
It might not have occurred to you Edie, but anonymity isn't the crime of the century you know - and as many will bear witness to (on this blog anyway), knowing someone's name doesn't mean they are a saint.
Delete“It might not have occurred to you Edie, but anonymity isn't the crime of the century you know - and as many will bear witness to (on this blog anyway), knowing someone's name doesn't mean they are a saint.”
DeleteIt occurred to me a long time ago Carbo, and it seemed reasonable to me, a man who hid in the shadows as an anonymous, was a cowardly and gutless man, a man without the courage of his convictions. Saint, I’m about a million miles from becoming a Saint.
Eddie
And did it occur to you that the Pope's reluctance to beatify you might also be a reason why so many commenters on here choose to remain anonymous. Not because they are are gutless cowards, but because they don't want their families to experience cold calling bullies like you?
DeleteCarbo you twice signposted my private address on your blog. Because of threats and junk turning up at my house, and the fear caused to my wife, we dumped the place. And you have the neck to comment on one phone call I made to a dietition to confirm her identity, which I reported myself.
ReplyDeleteWhat does that make you Carbo.
Eddie
It was your own naïveté that meant your address was publicly available wasn't it? As such, I cannot be held responsible for the public availability of your address. Just as you managed to find the telephone number of one dietitian, anyone with an interest in tracking you down could have done exactly what I did - a simple whois search for a domain name known to be owned by you. I just saved them from doing the search. If you have a complaint about the behaviour of some people on the Internet, then report them to to the authorities - it is against the law you know.
DeleteEdiot, you poor old sod, you had to dump your home because of threats and junk, did you? We all know that this is an out and out lie, you were forced to shift because you ran into financial difficulty.
DeleteIf you received threats and junk you can only blame yourself for it, authors of vile blogs will inevitably create enemies. Face up to it, you are about as popular as a fart in a lift, nobody likes you.
Some of us know more than Ediot thinks.
DeleteJust the dietitian that you gave a hard time was it? You know that is not true too You may get more surprises Ediot. You can run but you cannot hide.
Janet, you forgot to say...allegedly
DeleteCarbo/Tubolard
ReplyDeleteAs we are not pulling the punches, according to another one of your blogs, you suffered severe child abuse when young. Do you think this may have a bearing on your attitude on this blog ?
Eddie
I rest my case.
DeleteAnd this post confirms what a complete and utter b'stard you are, not that this has come as a surprise.
ReplyDeleteI am beginning to wonder if they dropped you on your head a few times after birth.
Karma will catch up with you eventually, you will get what you deserve fair and square.
I am absolutely appalled at the last comment by Eddie - no wonder the ETYM forum has dumped him and all of his so called friends have stayed away from the blog.
ReplyDeleteTake a look at yourself Mr Mitchell!
You really have surpassed yourself Ediot. You are lower than a snake's belly and it begs the question why anyone would want to associate with you unless they hold the same immoral values as you do.
ReplyDeleteETYM didn't dump him, he left of his own volition. He would still be posting there if the members were in agreement with him. He is unable to debate but takes everything personally. Those who know him are aware that he cannot accept criticism.
If ETYM had really known him then he wouldn't have even been able to join. The very fact that he was allowed membership there put a lot of people off joining and there doesn't seem to be a lot of movement there anyway. The same old people all agreeing with each other. In order for a forum to survive you need some debating but with the exception of Ediot's controversial contributions, there is nothing going on.
All there seems to be is an unhealthy "How many Karma's can I get competition" and some re-runs of the recipes on DCUK.
Ediot, I have news for you, I am the one who called you an utter and complete b*stard, I believe in speaking the truth :-)
ReplyDeleteI am also neither a dullard, nor a drug addict or carb infested, in actual fact I probably eat less carbs than you do. My personal choice, I dont go bragging on about it because I do believe in freedom of choice and know that despite what you seem to think, low carb is not the only way to control diabetes.
Look forward to karma hitting you, that time will surely come, when it does, go, look over your shoulder, you will see us standing there laughing with all our might. You are an evil, rotten character through and through, its quite an achievement actually.........
You can see the tumbleweed rolling by in Eddies blog. He is trying more and more extreme posts to get posters and attention. After his last comment here, he should be quiet and ashamed of himself.
ReplyDelete“Ediot, I have news for you, I am the one who called you an utter and complete b*stard, I believe in speaking the truth :-)
ReplyDeleteI am also neither a dullard, nor a drug addict or carb infested, in actual fact I probably eat less carbs than you do. My personal choice, I dont go bragging on about it because I do believe in freedom of choice and know that despite what you seem to think, low carb is not the only way to control diabetes.
Look forward to karma hitting you, that time will surely come, when it does, go, look over your shoulder, you will see us standing there laughing with all our might. You are an evil, rotten character through and through, its quite an achievement actually......…”
So bravely spoken, I am in awe of your courage. We need more people like you. Honest, brave, and people who have the courage of their convictions. Carbo sets the example, gutless, cowardly and damaged, but heh that’s what this blog is all about. A home for the weak and the damaged.
Eddie
...and it's not even Friday yet!
DeleteYour growing on me Carbo. Like some cancerous wart. How you would like to come out of the shadows of the gutless and anonymous. One day eh mate, true freedom and salvation. A life without fear, and breathing fresh air. Try it, it’s wonderful. To live a life without fear of outcome.
ReplyDeleteEddie
It's only a day away tho'
DeleteSo speaketh the man who hides behind anonymous blogs and sock puppets. The only reason why you are so 'open' is because you stupidly allowed your details to be freely accessed on the net.
DeleteIf you are so open why do you censor so many posts on your blog? I've made many an attempt to post a reasoned comment on there but not one has been published.
There's only one thing that's worse that a coward Eddie, and that's a hypocritical coward. Eddie, you are weak and a coward to boot we all know you wouldn't meet anyone face to face, you can't even hack being disagreed with on ETYM without having a flounce. You're the archetypal coward Eddie, admit it, know it makes sense.
So profound Carbo. What insight you offer us. Are you a philosopher, are you a sage ? Please enthuse us with your acumen.
ReplyDeleteEddie
Heaven forbid anyone takes on Ediot's traits, who would want to live his kind of lifestyle sitting in front of their PC non-stop spewing rubbish and bile?
ReplyDeleteIncidnetally, Ediot has his uses, quirky friend of mine, a printer presented me with an early Christmas present, a bogroll with Ediots pic printed on every sheet ROTFL
1001 uses of Ediot- already knew his mugshot makes the perfect dartboard cover, Ediot, feel the vibes LOL
And there was me thinking it was the season of goodwill to all men.
Delete""And there was me thinking it was the season of goodwill to all men.""
DeleteCarbo,it is, it is! Can you not tell that some of us are trying extremely hard to find something positive, useful in connection with the Ediot?
Seasons Greetings to you Carbo and your family x
Carbo, it is indeed the season of goodwill to all men, note it says 'men' and not parasites.
DeleteMay I take this opportunity to wish you and yours a Very Merry Christmas and a Happy, Healthy, Prosperous New Year.
It took longer than I thought but Eddie is finally getting the kicking he deserves. To think he even tried to befriend me on facebook. What a loser LOL
ReplyDeleteMuch kudos to the ETYM members, they haven't allowed Eddie to take over and now he's thrown his teddy out of the pram...yet again.
ReplyDeleteThere's hope for that place yet.